Fervr
Daily articles, reviews & videos for Christian teens

What is the Apocrypha?

Should we be reading the Apocrypha like we read the Bible?

| October 6, 2011 | 6 comments Print Article

It's not the Old Testament or the New Testament

During the 400 years of silence between the end of the Old Testament and the coming of Jesus, may other works were written, including books of history, fiction, practical living, and 'end-times' speculations. These books are also known as the apocrypha, which means “hidden” or “secret” because the religious leaders of that time preferred that the books not be widely read by the people.

While these books were read by some of God’s people, they were treated more like popular Christian books (e.g. something you might buy at a Christian bookstore), but they were never accepted as Scripture for many reasons.

Why the Apocrypha is not in the Bible

1) Many of the apocryphal books were pseudepigraphal, meaning that they were written under a false name so that the true identity of the author would be unknown. These 'pen names' were often those of Biblical people (e.g., Enoch, Abraham, Moses and Solomon), deceitfully leading readers to believe the books were written by these Biblical men.

2) While the Old Testament is quoted some 300 times in the New Testament, none of the apocryphal books are ever quoted in the New Testament or even alluded to, (with the exception of a much debated section of Jude), showing that none of the New Testament writers seemed to consider the Apocrypha as scripture.

3) Both Jews and Christians rejected any of the apocryphal books as divinely inspired sacred Scripture. However, that changed for some at the Council of Trent in 1546. At that time, the Catholic Church was facing a growing protest movement (now known as the Protestants) that denounced some of the church's teaching as unbiblical. Among the chief critics was the Catholic monk, Martin Luther, who pointed out that praying to saints, paying indulgences to the church, and purgatory were not found in the Bible. In an effort to defend themselves, the Catholic church voted to insert new books into the Bible, more than a millennium after the Old Testament had been completed and the apocryphal books had been rejected as Scripture. Why? Because it found some support for its unbiblical doctrines in the apocrypha and, rather than changing its doctrines, it instead chose to change its Bible. Subsequently, if you open Catholic Bibles today, you will find books with names such as Tobit, Judith, the Wisdom of Solomon, Ecclesiasticus or the Wisdom of Jesus ben Sirach, Baruch, 1 & 2 Maccabees, as well as additions to Esther and the book of Daniel.

Share This Article

Comments (6)

Please sign in or register to add a comment.

  • Carolina William
    April 15, 12 - 12:38am

    Thanks for explaining it so well. It’s nice to be able to understand it completely.

  • Neal Fontenot
    March 23, 12 - 9:55am

    Please no one take this the wrong way, I honestly don’t want to spark any sort of argument, just present things from the Catholic point of view.  As far as the history of the deuterocanonical books, they have been included in the bible as far back as the 4th Century when the Church approved the Vulgate Bible as the official bible of the Catholic Church, which included the deuterocanonical books.  They weren’t officially declared as canon until the Council of Trent because there had never been a large group of people saying that they were NOT canon, so the Church reinforced a pre-existing conviction.   Also, the only biblical record of the Chanukah story is in 1 Maccabees, so there must be some sort of authority to at least that book in the Jewish community.  I’m not a biblical scholar, so I honestly don’t know about references in the New Testament.  Once again, I don’t want to offend anyone, because I honestly believe that Protestants and Catholics need to emphasize similarities more than differences, but this post is obviously an attack on the Catholic Church and its doctrines.  And if this site is for only Protestant Christians, please don’t call it a Christian site, call it a Protestant site, because we’re Christians, too.

    • Carolina William
      April 15, 12 - 12:37am

      I agree. So long as you believe in Jesus, you are a Christian. It doesn’t matter if some of our beliefs differ slightly.
      I’m actually nondenominational.

  • John Zoe
    October 7, 11 - 12:37pm

    Excellent, thanks for explaining well

  • Nathan Gibb
    October 7, 11 - 9:45am

    Im always concern about so called popular christian books become more popular than the bible and taken as biblical truth just because there are some few references to the bible. Some of the books can be good and make the bible clearer, but its better to know your bible well.

    • Carolina William
      April 15, 12 - 12:38am

      AMEN!

    Sign In Sign Up
    Close

    Sign In To Fervr

    Don't have an Account? Sign up here! | Forgot Your Password?

    Close
    Check Out the Fervr Store
    Close